Search found 5 matches
- Sun Jun 05, 2022 1:11 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Next SITREP
- Replies: 15
- Views: 720
Re: Next SITREP
For sure. But it feels like it's getting harder to suggest or contribute since we are seeing so little on the gameplay side. That's game development, though. Definitely would love to see more details on the gameplay - especially things like squad management. From the trailer we know about the conte...
- Sun May 29, 2022 12:01 pm
- Forum: SITREP
- Topic: SITREP: Insurgent Weapons
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1533
Re: SITREP: Insurgent Weapons
What a post, krzy! Thanks for taking the time to write this up for us and including links. While I'm not confirming these specific tweaks to the weapons we have available, these references are very, very helpful to us. Thanks, and just to re-iterate: these are just some ideas. Whether you guys and ...
- Thu May 26, 2022 1:11 pm
- Forum: SITREP
- Topic: SITREP: Insurgent Weapons
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1533
Re: SITREP: Insurgent Weapons
3.) On your final note of why you shouldn't go around firing AK's to prevent blue on blue, why not let players discover this the hard way? Why not have us endure blue-on-blue as a result? Perhaps your squad mates ridicule you or straight up call you an idiot for carrying an Insurgent weapon as your...
- Fri May 13, 2022 5:54 am
- Forum: Suggestions & Feedback
- Topic: M16A4 M5 RAS
- Replies: 2
- Views: 315
Re: M16A4 M5 RAS
No confirmation whether devs will change it, but at least they know already. So here's hoping! 

- Tue May 03, 2022 10:28 am
- Forum: SITREP
- Topic: SITREP: USMC Weapons
- Replies: 20
- Views: 3158
Re: SITREP: USMC Weapons
Howdy! Regarding weapon models, it seems to me that the M16A4 quad rail is not modelled after the USMC-issue KAC M5 rail system. The asset in game lacks cutouts characteristic for M5 rail, which allow the bottom rail to be removed and replaced with M203 grenade launcher . Here is photo of actual M16...